Could one really start from you see things course of they are reflecting light.

 

I don't think so. Furthermore it is likely, I couldn't get it a different way, you see all which is visible because of their spatiality.  

 

Meaning, if you had a white sheet of paper directly in front of your eyes and you would hold it yourself with your own hands and someone would ask you what you see, you would answer:" nothing".

 

Here is no difference really if you would have held the sheet yourself or not. You have the paper in your hands, you see the white, and you would answer:" nothing" .

 

Why can this be. I think it is course of the spatial appearance you missing. The sheet of paper in your hands is so closed in front of your eyes you do not distinguish it to an other background. You're really do see nothing. 

 

So for the times earth is visible out of space this becomes of  importance. Because, since this time humans can say the universe is not two dimensional. This is not meaning in the same moment it was three dimensional. It just means what I have written, it can not be two dimensional. You could not have known this, doing such a statement as long as you couldn't leave earth or better, as long as you could not see the planet earth out of space. 

 

So nothing really that exists can be two dimensional. 

Everything that we do understand as existing has to have a three dimensional shape. What this is with space this is still a question that is left. You needed to be able to leave the universe to get closer to what it was.

 

A pencil point for example, which one could make on the sheet of paper has a high, a length and is wide. The high is minimal, but relevant. The prove is, the lead of the pencil remains on the paper after the contact. Mass is gone from the pencils lead. The point that was visible now is in the kind and manner described above? 

 

It got a length, a height and is wide. It is connected to an background the paper. For this reason it is three dimensional. Just for the case it could move freely in front of the paper, it was four dimensional, wasn't it? 

 

So now you see the earth with this what you understand as space, universe, what other terms are there for it, in front of space? Earth is described as being spatial, space surrounds earth space can not be two dimensional. Things are first visible when they are three dimensional at least. Thus, a wrong question would come up, which is:" Was space visible?"  Wrong question cause people have no clue which the name for the black matter they see as space was. Is it space? Is it the universe? Is it cosmos? Is it black, simply? Is it being same at all positions? 

 

All this question might not have got no proper answer arguably, as long as one is mainly watching space from earth.    

 

        

 

 

 

 

--

« back  

 

 

Steffen Schenk

Rhythm University

a